Hi Nicolas, The commit you found replaces the profile files from Eclipse with a new file which I generated independently. My understanding is that given this file contains information that is public knowledge to the Java community, is of a different format and uses different file access semantics this constitutes it's own IP. As such I'm happy to apply the ASL header on this basis. If that is acceptable then I will push an update with this clarification, PM's please advise?
Regards, Dave 2010/11/29 Nicolas Lalevée <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I was working on the import of Bushel into Ivy [1], and there were some files > under the EPL which I had to remove from the import. These files were > defining the packages which should be part of the bootstrap classpath > depending on the execution environment. > > I then thought I would find such similar files in the source of Felix but ASL > friendly. I have found them: [2]. > > But the ASL header is missing. Then I started to wonder if this file was a > real ASF one, and I searched svn and I have found a commit that makes me > doubt [3]. > > Considering the IP contained is these files, I think that the new file is > safe to be an ASF one. So could you add the ASL header so there won't be any > doubt ? > > cheers, > Nicolas > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42079.html > [2] > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/sigil/common/core/profiles/jvm-packages.properties > [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=983901 > >
