On 1 Jul 2011, at 17:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> 2011/7/1 Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>:
>> As Richard says below, historically Felix releases included both .zip and 
>> .tar.gz of the project (these are the main things we vote on)
>> 
>> But the latest Apache parent pom only produces a .zip of the project release 
>> by default - so recent releases have only included .zip
>> 
>> However we can choose to have both by adding:
>> 
>>    <properties>
>>        
>> <sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-tar</sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>
>>    </properties>
>> 
>> To the Felix parent pom and deploying v2.1
>> 
> 
> Yes, we should do this - this was what we discussed after the event admin 
> release suffering from the same problem.

righto - are you planning to update/deploy the new parent pom or should I do 
that?

> Carsten
> 
>> WDYT?
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers, Stuart
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "Richard S. Hall" <[email protected]>
>>> Date: 1 July 2011 17:13:20 GMT+01:00
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Bundle Repository version 1.6.6
>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> On 7/1/11 12:10, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>> On 1 Jul 2011, at 15:59, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> This is the same issue as the Event Admin (?) release, when switching to 
>>>>> the new parent pom, we don't get a tar.gz project release, only a zip 
>>>>> release. What did we decide here? Are we going to switch to only a zip 
>>>>> release?
>>>> the default (in the parent Apache pom) is to only produce a zip release, 
>>>> but you can get both zip and tar by setting:
>>>> 
>>>>     <properties>
>>>>         
>>>> <sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-tar</sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>
>>>>     </properties>
>>>> 
>>>> so we could always add this to the parent Felix pom (and deploy a new 2.1? 
>>>> release of that) if people want both
>>> 
>>> It doesn't matter to me, really, but we've always had both and now we only 
>>> have one. So, it seems like we need to make a decision for consistency 
>>> purposes.
>>> 
>>> -> richard
>>> 
>>>>> ->  richard
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/29/11 19:27, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We solved 4 issues in this release:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22bundlerepository-1.6.6%22
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There are still several outstanding issues:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Bundle+Repository+%28OBR%29%22+AND+status+%3D+Open
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-008/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
>>>>>> signatures:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Usage:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    sh check_staged_release.sh 008 /tmp/felix-staging
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers, Stuart
>>>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [email protected]

Reply via email to