It would be great if you can do that - I fear I won't have time before end of next week
Regards Carsten 2011/7/1 Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>: > On 1 Jul 2011, at 17:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >> 2011/7/1 Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>: >>> As Richard says below, historically Felix releases included both .zip and >>> .tar.gz of the project (these are the main things we vote on) >>> >>> But the latest Apache parent pom only produces a .zip of the project >>> release by default - so recent releases have only included .zip >>> >>> However we can choose to have both by adding: >>> >>> <properties> >>> >>> <sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-tar</sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor> >>> </properties> >>> >>> To the Felix parent pom and deploying v2.1 >>> >> >> Yes, we should do this - this was what we discussed after the event admin >> release suffering from the same problem. > > righto - are you planning to update/deploy the new parent pom or should I do > that? > >> Carsten >> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, Stuart >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: "Richard S. Hall" <[email protected]> >>>> Date: 1 July 2011 17:13:20 GMT+01:00 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Bundle Repository version 1.6.6 >>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> On 7/1/11 12:10, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >>>>> On 1 Jul 2011, at 15:59, Richard S. Hall wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is the same issue as the Event Admin (?) release, when switching to >>>>>> the new parent pom, we don't get a tar.gz project release, only a zip >>>>>> release. What did we decide here? Are we going to switch to only a zip >>>>>> release? >>>>> the default (in the parent Apache pom) is to only produce a zip release, >>>>> but you can get both zip and tar by setting: >>>>> >>>>> <properties> >>>>> >>>>> <sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor>source-release-zip-tar</sourceReleaseAssemblyDescriptor> >>>>> </properties> >>>>> >>>>> so we could always add this to the parent Felix pom (and deploy a new >>>>> 2.1? release of that) if people want both >>>> >>>> It doesn't matter to me, really, but we've always had both and now we only >>>> have one. So, it seems like we need to make a decision for consistency >>>> purposes. >>>> >>>> -> richard >>>> >>>>>> -> richard >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/29/11 19:27, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We solved 4 issues in this release: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22bundlerepository-1.6.6%22 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are still several outstanding issues: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FELIX+AND+component+%3D+%22Bundle+Repository+%28OBR%29%22+AND+status+%3D+Open >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Staging repository: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-008/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the >>>>>>> signatures: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Usage: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 008 /tmp/felix-staging >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Cheers, Stuart >>>>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> [email protected] > > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
