[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255187#comment-13255187
]
Göktürk Gezer commented on FELIX-3461:
--------------------------------------
Oh no! the second way that i proposed in my comment will not work. Incremented
parameter index fixes the type of property at re-manipulation but because of
the changed index, "properties" section will contain false constructor
parameter index causing constructor registration code to fail.
I thought it may save us from modifying code at 2 place but doing it introduces
problems that can not be handled nicely. So i believe we must treat
constructors differently then the other methods.
> Re-manipulation with annotated component produces corrupted MANIFEST
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: iPOJO
> Reporter: Göktürk Gezer
> Labels: ipojo-manipulator
> Attachments: org.apache.felix.ipojo.manipulator.patch
>
>
> As the manipulation process alters the annotations of original classes on
> generated ones. It leaves it in inconsistent state for re-manipulation. While
> re-manipulation process does not touch classes, re-manipulated bundle is
> unable to function because of a corrupted MANIFEST.
> Broken MANIFEST is missing some handler declarations because of the filters
> and have entries in manipulation section those should have been hided.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
