[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13255592#comment-13255592
]
Göktürk Gezer commented on FELIX-3461:
--------------------------------------
Yeah, but they are heavily interconnected.
#1: yeah they are not correctly handled, because they are handled the same way
with other methods, while they have seperate characteristic.
#2: Metadata is not wrong,MANIFEST also is not wrong. They are what they should
be. But for second manipulation, they must be interpreted specifically.
So if #1 is solved, then #2 can be solved. Trying to solve only #2 leaves #1
and whole issue unfixed. So fixing #1 is a contribution to fixing #2.
If you perform the steps i wrote, you'll see the problem. And then
re-performing with patch applied will make sense.
> Re-manipulation with annotated component produces corrupted MANIFEST
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-3461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3461
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: iPOJO
> Reporter: Göktürk Gezer
> Labels: ipojo-manipulator
> Attachments: FELIX-3461-GSA.patch,
> org.apache.felix.ipojo.manipulator.patch
>
>
> As the manipulation process alters the annotations of original classes on
> generated ones. It leaves it in inconsistent state for re-manipulation. While
> re-manipulation process does not touch classes, re-manipulated bundle is
> unable to function because of a corrupted MANIFEST.
> Broken MANIFEST is missing some handler declarations because of the filters
> and have entries in manipulation section those should have been hided.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
