David, There is, at least, substantial apathy about git on the part of the sub-communities that work on some of the sub-projects. In my view, this apathy, including perhaps a bit of antipathy, sunk the discussion of just converting as one big repo. As I see it, Felix is a bit of a loose confederation, and Ray's suggestion is consistent with letting each of the tribes make up its own mind.
At least, that's how I read the recent email messages (and lacks of email messages). --benson On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:20 AM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I apologize for losing track of this whole discussion. I don’t recall seeing > a convincing to me reason to have, at least initially, more than one git > repo. Wasn’t there even a new git feature that let you check out only part > of a project? > > However many repos we decide on, I’m in favor of git :-) With my chronic > distraction I will wait a bit to see if someone else organizes the vote > (thanks Carsten). > > david jencks > >> On Dec 1, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Benson Margulies wrote >>> I would like to peel the bundle plugin. Does any pmc member sympathize >>> sufficiently to start a vote to test consensus to do that? >> >> I don't want to be a PITA, but would you care about writing a more >> detailed description of what that would mean? (git repo name, how it is >> set up) I'm actually not sure what it would need as a description but >> definitely a little bit more than just saying "move to git" :) >> >> I wouldn't mind starting a vote based on that - unless someone signals >> that this is a stupid idea :) >> >> Carsten >> >>> >>> On Dec 1, 2015 9:38 AM, "Raymond Auge" <raymond.a...@liferay.com >>> <mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Uhhhh ok.. let me see if I can belatedly recapture the brilliance.. >>> >>> I think it was simply the observation that if the end result was to have >>> many repos, couldn't each subproject just start pealing itself off >>> into a >>> git repo as it sees fit? >>> >>> Call it lazy migration if you will. >>> >>> The side effects are going to be limited to those sub projects as >>> they are >>> in transition. But the bulk of main project can safely continue to >>> work in >>> the meantime. >>> >>> That's the entire anti-climactic idea. >>> >>> - Ray >>> On Dec 1, 2015 9:02 AM, "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@apache.org >>> <mailto:cziege...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>>> Benson Margulies wrote >>>>> It sure seems as if there are no PMC members fond enough of the git >>>>> idea to call a vote. I'm treating this as a dead topic for now. >>>>> >>>> Looks like :( >>>> >>>> I had a brief discussion two weeks ago with Ray, and he had an >>>> interesting idea. @Ray do you want to bring it up? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Carsten >>>> -- >>>> Carsten Ziegeler >>>> Adobe Research Switzerland >>>> cziege...@apache.org <mailto:cziege...@apache.org> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> Adobe Research Switzerland >> cziege...@apache.org >
