rotty3000 commented on code in PR #359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/359#discussion_r1883964722
##########
log/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -49,36 +49,49 @@
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>osgi.core</artifactId>
<version>6.0.0</version>
+ <scope>provided</scope>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>org.osgi.service.cm</artifactId>
+ <version>1.6.0</version>
+ <scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>org.osgi.service.log</artifactId>
<version>1.5.0</version>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>osgi.annotation</artifactId>
+ <version>8.1.0</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>org.osgi.namespace.service</artifactId>
+ <version>1.0.0</version>
+ </dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>org.osgi.service.component.annotations</artifactId>
+ <version>1.5.1</version>
+ </dependency>
Review Comment:
I have always modeled this (to avoid any upstream "maven" dependency on the
library) as `provided`. See
[here](https://github.com/apache/aries-cdi/blob/master/pom.xml#L238-L282)
My reasoning is this: "I have already made use of the dependency, there is
no need for it to be __provided__ by anyone else."
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
