Hi Adriana, I am unable to reproduce your issues. Will you create the scenario in demo instance and share the link with the screenshot?
Thanks Santosh On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Adriana Pinto <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Actually, we only have the issue when we set “*Number of days a loan may > be overdue before moving into arrears*” on 3 at the product loan. > > It doesn’t wave the charges from the first 3 days after the payment date, > and it should according to documentation. > > Is there something we are missing on the loan configuration? > > > > Thank you. > > Adriana > > > > *De:* Santosh Math [mailto:[email protected]] > *Enviado el:* martes, 22 de agosto de 2017 08:57 a.m. > *Para:* Adriana Pinto <[email protected]> > *CC:* Ed Cable <[email protected]>; Jose Garcia <[email protected]>; > ConfluxNazeer Shaik <[email protected]>; Alex Moses < > [email protected]>; Erick Gonzalez <[email protected]>; Dev < > [email protected]>; Juan Pablo Alvarez <[email protected]> > *Asunto:* RE: Arrears Tolerance & Overdue Charges Job - MIFOS > > > > Sure Sir.. You're welcome.. :) > > > > On Aug 22, 2017 8:07 PM, "Adriana Pinto" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Santosh. > > I tested this approach and it works when applying the charges from the job. > > Really thank you. I’ll let you know how it continues working… > > > > Regards, > > Adriana > > > > *De:* Santosh Math [mailto:[email protected]] > *Enviado el:* lunes, 21 de agosto de 2017 10:23 p.m. > *Para:* Adriana Pinto <[email protected]> > *CC:* Ed Cable <[email protected]>; Alex Moses <[email protected]>; Nazeer > Shaik <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > Juan Pablo Alvarez <[email protected]>; Erick Gonzalez < > [email protected]>; Jose Garcia <[email protected]> > *Asunto:* Re: Arrears Tolerance & Overdue Charges Job - MIFOS > > > > Hi Adriana, > > > > It requires one more configuration "Penalty wait period" > (Admin>System>Configuratons) to be set as 2 in order to take the effect. If > it is zero, then the result will be as you seen. > > > > Greets > > Santosh > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Adriana Pinto <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello Community. > > According to the documentation, when you set the field: “*Number of days > a loan may be overdue before moving into arrears*” on 2, it’s supposed to > give 2 says of grace in arrears. > > We’ve doing some tests and it doesn’t work this way. Actually, it doesn’t > work. Every payment date is on 14 of each month, then the overdue charges > should apply from day 16, but it’s ignoring this grace period and applying > charges normally. > > Have you ever had this inconvenient reported by someone else? I was > looking for it at Jira and Fineract Community, but I wasn’t able to find > some issue about it. > > > > Furthermore, when we apply overdue charges using the Job defined at the > system, we noticed they are applied by two days before the current day. For > example, if we apply them on August 21, the Job runs until August 19. This > is a behavior we’ve checked out even if we use tolerance in arrears or not. > Maybe tolerance and jobs are independent, but we tried to figure out any > relation, but it wasn’t found. > > > > We’d be really thankful if you provide us some guide or workaround related > with this topic. > > Thanks in advance, > > Adriana > > > > > > [image: AdrianaPinto] > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards > > Santosh Math > > Lead QA & Support > > Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru > > Skype:santoshmath99 > > -- Thanks and Regards Santosh Math Lead QA & Support Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru Skype:santoshmath99
