[Reminder - please stay on thread]

RESULTS:  On Tuesday this week I gave a talk at ApacheCON about a few key
themes.  One of those was a discussion of the recent Survey that I
advertised here on dev.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Survey+Results+-+2021+August
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Survey+Results+-+2021+August>

A few key things jump out at me: (commentary).

1)  We have a growing number of people who are here (nearly 30%) because of
their workplace.  They have been introduced to the project due to where
they work.
I believe this is a sign of a maturing project.
Caveat:  Since we did not ask this question before in exactly this way, we
will need to ask it again in a year or two to find out if this is a real
phenomena.

2) n = 41, which is exactly the number of Committers on the project.
Coincidence?!?
or a sign that we're getting a good sample of engaged people?
Next time I will ask if respondents are Committers or members of PMC.

3) Despite not having a formal release out, fineractCN is being used in
production, and (for obvious reasons) clearly forked by a fairly high
percentage of respondents. While fineract1.x is still dominant, the use of
FineractCN by 22% of respondents is super interesting.

4) Related, and a sign of a healthy community, about 50% of the respondents
said that they would be interested in helping with fineractCN despite a
lower percentage actually using it and knowing what changes it entails.
That seems like a vote for Community!   It also suggests a strategy:  let's
find out what those forks are doing, what domains, what features? [new
thread to be started, related to Architecture working group  ]

5) We asked where "your customers are located".... meaning if you are an
integrator or working for one, where are your implementations.  Africa
region #1, Americas #2.  See the results.

Please feel free to comment here.  Please stay on thread... i.e. it should
be about what the survey is telling us, not some other thread.

Thanks
@[email protected] <[email protected]>

Reply via email to