Hi James, Thank you so much for your guidance! I will take a closer look at the issues, and if I have a few ideas, I'd like to get back to you about them.
Best, Yu Wati Nyi On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 5:20 PM James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Welcome to the community Yu Wati Nyi > > Rarely do I see a ticket number under 500 so I had to take a look. I > closed most of those tickets a couple of years ago as "will not fix". > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-391 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-391> > > Is a minor feature but may involve getting into the weeds of how the > database functions. If you do take this on, I would urge you to write the > tests first and then to discuss in the Comment field of the ticket. > > This would define the feature concept better and is a necessary first > step. There are several edge cases I could imagine. > > Also the term "DELETE" is probably not the correct phrasing - more like > "flag as inactive". This requires some advanced understanding of how > other such features work in Fineract, so you would be advised to look at > those similar patterns I believe. Obviously, deleting data entries without > addressing the relationships to other tables would be problematic. > > Best of luck. > > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 1:07 PM Yuwati Nyi <yuwatinyi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I hope you are all doing well! I have signed up for a Jira account with >> Apache Fineract and would love to start contributing! I am particularly >> interested in starting with FINERACT-391 and would appreciate it if I could >> be assigned to this issue. >> My Jira username is yuwatidora. >> >> Thank you so much for your time! >> Best, >> Yu Wati Nyi >> >
