Kapil - My understanding is that you took an existing and well known design pattern (at least 10 years old) as well as the work done on Fineract CQRS by devs here over the past many years, applied some AI tooling, packaged it on maven central, called it “yours” and released it publicly as if it was your invention and also updated a wikipedia page to further claim some providence. Now you’re commenting on issues resolved on this “invention”, which as far as I can tell, has no relevance to this community (we’re not using “your” library) and isn’t an invention.
Do I have that right? Sent from Gmail Mobile On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 6:12 AM Kapil Panchal < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have managed to fix the post-processing (retry mechanism) with the > current New Command Processing Infrastructure. I also created a library for > the New Command Processing Infrastructure and uploaded it to Maven Central. > I have tested the complete pipeline and it works quite well! > > https://mvnrepository.com/search?q=io.github.kapil-panchal > > [image: image.png] > > Though the complete CQRS new command infrastructure pipeline is fixed, it > desires much more, a little bit of reflection and annotation should put us > in the right orbit? > > Thanks, > Kapil >
