Please update the list /community . Sent from Gmail Mobile
On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 6:54 PM Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]> wrote: > ... that is unfortunately colliding with another meeting I have... starts > at the same time and is scheduled 1.5 hours... I have updates though... > quite a bit. > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 2:58 PM James Dailey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Aleksander - Can you provide an update on the call on Monday about FSIP >> 5? >> >> >> >> >> James Dailey >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 6:49 PM Aman Mittal <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> I want to ask if we should bring back sonarqube back to ci check, while >>> there was still some conversation in dev list few months ago. >>> >>> There is also a proposal of co-lending feature discussed in >>> last meeting. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026, 8:10 AM James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Community - >>>> >>>> If we can start to imagine a roadmap for Fineract, and agree on some of >>>> these directions, then we can work on them together. Feb 16th meeting, >>>> let's plan to discuss them. >>>> >>>> First, we start with the FSIPs (Fineract Significant Improvement >>>> Projects). Please review. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Fineract+Significant+Improvement+Proposals >>>> >>>> FSIP-1 nearly done... >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1908 >>>> What remains? >>>> >>>> FSIP-2. DONE >>>> FSIP-3. DONE. Please confirm (@Adam Saghy) >>>> FSIP-4. DONE. >>>> FSIP-5. SOME PROGRESS. (@alexander) >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/FSIP-5%3A+New+command+processing+infrastructure. >>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/FSIP-5%3A+New+command+processing+infrastructure.> >>>> >>>> Next, what new FSIPs should we have? - what relatively "big" new areas >>>> of work. >>>> >>>> Some things are planned by teams already working on the project. For >>>> example the progressive loan module will continue to evolve. Let's get a >>>> few high level things there that are already on those external roadmaps for >>>> transparency. >>>> >>>> Then, there are a number of ideas ... Some of these discussed before >>>> and a few I have put into the GSOC "build a proof of concept" group. >>>> >>>> * Revolving Line of Credit >>>> * Negative Balance Current Accounts >>>> * More separation of components (see also FSIP 5) >>>> * Minimal UI for an operator of the system - fulfilling the idea of >>>> Fineract plus a front end is a "batteries included" concept. >>>> * Backend for Front End for the Self Service APis / channel APIs >>>> * MCP >>>> * Additional test coverage for stability and CI/CD >>>> * Change databases supported natively >>>> * API versioning >>>> * Consent mechanism for PII data and storage of consent record (client >>>> record) >>>> * Loan Origination flow and connection to risk scoring /underwriting >>>> processes >>>> * Integration ease for external Fraud detection system (e.g. Tazama >>>> open source project) >>>> * External report mechanism integration options (BI tooling external) >>>> * Attribute Based Access Control in addition to Role based >>>> * Documentation suitable for deployment audits >>>> >>>> These need to be sorted but first... take a look and see if I've missed >>>> something important. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> James >>>> >>>>
