Aman,

Thank you for starting this important topic.

*+1 to starting a dedicated discussion and adopting a lightweight,
project-specific AI policy.*

I support the direction because AI-assisted development is already
happening (it is very noticeable this year before the GSOC and  the
increasing numbers of PRs submitted and merged) and clear, practical
guidelines (for developers and reviewers) will help us benefit from it
without creating problems for maintainers or the project’s legal posture.
An optional disclosure approach plus a short *AI_POLICY.md* inspired by
Apache Fory’s is a sensible starting point. It can be adapted for Apache
Fineract rather than copying it wholesale.

To address the concerns raised earlier (including those from Aleks) I think
is good to stay aligned with the ASF Generative Tooling Guidance
https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html

Best regards

Victor Romero



El lun, 31 ago 2026 a las 23:44, Aman Mittal (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to revive the discussion based on
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/xxoqt3jn8trhwo1lnxjy46r1dkolfg1h
>
> and Concerns raised by Aleks in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oq25gyjsx0wry4jf58odds9z92pfx6bj
>
> Regarding the usage and guidelines of AI, I think we need to discuss
> AI-assisted development a bit more, so I'm creating this dedicated thread
> on the dev list.
>
> As per my understanding, using AI is fine if contributors understand their
> work and can explain their reasoning for each line.
>
> So, I'm thinking we can start with an optional disclosure policy on that.
> I think we can add a AI_POLICY.md for each repo. One policy we can take
> inspiration from is https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md
> While we do not need to copy it entirely, we can take inspiration from it
> and modify it for FINERACT and all the repos based on community feedback.
>
> I suggest that it should include Commonly used AI setups that contributors
> did not declare in an AI usage disclosure.
>
> What does the community think about this?
>
> Regards
> Aman
>
>

Reply via email to