Hi Shivaansh, Aman, When we originally built out this functionality for Group Loans or Savings which needed Individual monitoring, there was a need for the same. I am not sure if the same is true today as well. Are there any implementers or MFI's on the list who have asked for the same ? If not, I wouldn't bother adding code to the back-office to show such niche functionalities . This extends to stuff like collection sheets etc and anything else that does not make sense with respect to hyper personalized individual lending. The aim of the backoffice should not be to have feature parity with an interface maintained by a sister open source community like Mifos or to show all possible functionality exposed by the core.
My suggestions would be to reduce the scope to have tight representations of the things which make sense to people right now, like being able to express all the functionality exposed by progressive loans and working capital. The less code you have the easier for people to maintain going forward, people value tokens and nobody would want to burn more than they have to. Regards, Vishwas On Thu, 12 Nov 2026 at 21:21, Shivaansh Pandey <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Aman, > > Thanks, will do. Along with the unit and Feign integration tests, I'll add > Cucumber E2E scenarios for GLIM loan creation, with and without totalLoan. > If the E2E part turns out large, I'll say so on FINERACT-3228 before > splitting anything. > > Thanks, > Shivaansh Pandey > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 10:48 AM Aman Mittal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Make sure to include relevant tests including e2e cucumber tests for >> this. I see that the code lacks sufficient coverage for this. >> >> Regards >> Aman >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 10:34 AM Shivaansh Pandey < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following up on my mail of 13 Oct, sorry this took longer than the date >>> I gave. I didn't hear otherwise, so I've filed the GLIM part as >>> FINERACT-3228: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-3228 >>> >>> I'm working on the fix (validator rule, unit test and Feign integration >>> test) and will link the PR on the ticket. I've only taken the GLIM part; >>> GSIM and the collection sheet stay with Tofunmi. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shivaansh Pandey >>> GitHub: shivaansh0610-LUFFY >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 11:47 AM Shivaansh Pandey < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tofunmi, James, all, >>>> >>>> I joined the list after Tofunmi's mail of September 12, so I can't >>>> reply to it directly. The thread is here: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3oy7fxpc7cjdn2osc6ppnr5ttss327g8 >>>> >>>> Thanks for the write-up. I reproduced the GLIM part (#1) on current >>>> develop (f9c2fcdc1c, 1.16.0-SNAPSHOT, PostgreSQL), and it is narrower >>>> than "no working request shape": >>>> >>>> - POST /v1/loans with loanType "glim", isParentAccount true and >>>> totalLoan 10000 returns 200 with glimId 1. >>>> - The identical request without totalLoan returns 403 >>>> error.msg.unknown.data.integrity.issue, and the backend log shows the >>>> not-null violation on glim_accounts.principal_amount. >>>> - GroupLoanIntegrationTest's GLIM tests (which send totalLoan) pass on >>>> PostgreSQL in CI at the same commit. >>>> >>>> So this looks like a missing validation rather than a Postgres >>>> incompatibility: the absent totalLoan reaches the glim_accounts insert >>>> as null, and the database error comes back as a generic 403. I have >>>> not tested MySQL or MariaDB. >>>> >>>> I searched Jira for GLIM, totalLoan, isParentAccount and glim_accounts >>>> and found no ticket for this (FINERACT-1279 is an unrelated 2020 >>>> charge / linked-savings case). >>>> >>>> Proposal: I will take just the GLIM piece—implementing a rule in >>>> LoanApplicationValidator that returns a 400 specifying the missing >>>> `totalLoan`, along with tests. Tofunmi, you mentioned filing JIRA >>>> first: would you like to file the GLIM ticket, or shall I file it and >>>> link #376? If I don't hear otherwise by Friday, October 16, I will >>>> file it and link back. GSIM and the collection sheet stay with you. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Shivaansh Pandey >>>> GitHub: shivaansh0610-LUFFY >>>> >>>
