Thank you Myrle. Sorry I was not disregarding mentors review comments rather I was trying to get some help/opinion from all of you for the next release. I will go ahead with releasing 0.6.0-incubating today by mentioning the same.
Thanks, Nazeer *Principal Architect, **Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>* *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please check. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Myrle Krantz <mkra...@mifos.org> wrote: > Hey Nazeer, > > Keep in mind, that, if it's not about the license, you can usually treat > what our mentors and reviewers says as advice that we can follow or not. > We shouldn't automatically disregard their advice, because that would > impact their willingness to review our releases. But if the effort is > large, and the benefit small, no one is going to be offended if we say > "no", or "later". If our mentors aren't responding on this issue, it's > likely because it's not very important to them. > > So we shouldn't let those points block our next release, but rather treat > them like any other ticket. > > Greets, > Myrle > > > > *Myrle Krantz* > Solutions Architect > RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative > mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org > <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Shaik Nazeer < > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > > > Hi Fineract mentors, > > > > > > > > After analysing a bit, integrating RAT to top level directory is > difficult > > as our complete build scripts are under sub directory. > > > > Either we need to add Gradle scripts to top level directory also or move > > the > > complete source tree from Fineract-provider to top level directory. > > > > I feel above two approaches area not good. So do you have any suggestions > > on > > this or shall I try to proceed with next release by adding "How to run > RAT" > > in readme without integrating RAT to top level directory? > > > > > > > > And I don't understand how maven is going to help here as we are giving > > complete deployable war file. > > > > > > > > Can you let me know your opinion on this please. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nazeer > > > > From: Shaik Nazeer [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com] > > Sent: 29 December 2016 18:27 > > To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: [Apache Fineract] Addressing review comments of 0.5.0-incubating > > release > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have created a JIRA task to address all review comments of > > 0.5.0-incubating release. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 > > > > > > > > I can handle all review comments except maven related. Does anybody know > > how > > to include maven repo as part of Fineract release? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Nazeer > > > > >
