Hey Nazeer, *I'm* sorry for expressing myself in a confusing manner. I didn't mean to imply you had done something wrong. You haven't.
When I said "We shouldn't automatically disregard [our mentors] advice", I didn't mean to imply that you were. I was just setting the context for the suggestion that we *do* disregard their advice, but only on maven artifacts, and top-level RAT checks for the upcoming version. Hopefully I haven't made things even more confusing... Greets, Myrle *Myrle Krantz* Solutions Architect RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Nazeer Shaik < nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > Thank you Myrle. Sorry I was not disregarding mentors review comments > rather I was trying to get some help/opinion from all of you for the next > release. > I will go ahead with releasing 0.6.0-incubating today by mentioning the > same. > > Thanks, > Nazeer > > *Principal Architect, **Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd > <http://www.confluxtechnologies.com/>* > > *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, > Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560043 INDIA > > > Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail message and any > files/attachment transmitted with it is confidential and for the sole use > of the intended recipient(s) or entity identified. If you are not the > intended recipient, please email: supp...@confluxtechnologies.com and > destroy/delete all copies and attachment thereto along with the original > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, > forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. The > recipient acknowledges that Conflux Technologies Private Limited or its > subsidiaries and associated companies are unable to exercise control or > ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information > contained in e-mail transmissions. Before opening any attachments, please > check. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Myrle Krantz <mkra...@mifos.org> wrote: > > > Hey Nazeer, > > > > Keep in mind, that, if it's not about the license, you can usually treat > > what our mentors and reviewers says as advice that we can follow or not. > > We shouldn't automatically disregard their advice, because that would > > impact their willingness to review our releases. But if the effort is > > large, and the benefit small, no one is going to be offended if we say > > "no", or "later". If our mentors aren't responding on this issue, it's > > likely because it's not very important to them. > > > > So we shouldn't let those points block our next release, but rather treat > > them like any other ticket. > > > > Greets, > > Myrle > > > > > > > > *Myrle Krantz* > > Solutions Architect > > RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative > > mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org > > <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Shaik Nazeer < > > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Fineract mentors, > > > > > > > > > > > > After analysing a bit, integrating RAT to top level directory is > > difficult > > > as our complete build scripts are under sub directory. > > > > > > Either we need to add Gradle scripts to top level directory also or > move > > > the > > > complete source tree from Fineract-provider to top level directory. > > > > > > I feel above two approaches area not good. So do you have any > suggestions > > > on > > > this or shall I try to proceed with next release by adding "How to run > > RAT" > > > in readme without integrating RAT to top level directory? > > > > > > > > > > > > And I don't understand how maven is going to help here as we are giving > > > complete deployable war file. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you let me know your opinion on this please. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Nazeer > > > > > > From: Shaik Nazeer [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com] > > > Sent: 29 December 2016 18:27 > > > To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: [Apache Fineract] Addressing review comments of > 0.5.0-incubating > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have created a JIRA task to address all review comments of > > > 0.5.0-incubating release. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 > > > > > > > > > > > > I can handle all review comments except maven related. Does anybody > know > > > how > > > to include maven repo as part of Fineract release? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Nazeer > > > > > > > > >
