Hey Roman,

I'll start a thread labeled [DISCUSS].  Here's the most recent state of
discussions among the community: http://markmail.org/thread/4vzjbopjeozrccka
 In that thread seven people gave their +1, and there were no objections.

Here's a log of what happened with respect to the community growth
12 committers at induction into incubation
+1 committer: Jim Jagielski
-1 committer: Michael Vorburger (couldn't find an apache id for him, when
assembling the proposal.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
-1 committer: Andrew Dzakpasu (received no response in public or in private
from him to the above referenced thread.)
--------> 11 PMC members

I'd like to keep Andrew on the committer list, and I'd like to add him to
the PMC, but I don't feel comfortable doing the latter without his
permission.  The same goes for Michael, except that I don't even know how
to keep him on the committer list without an apache id.

This all brings me to a question: is the list of initial committers in the
graduation proposal also the PMC? Or is it possible to start with a
difference in the list of committers and PMC?

Greets,
Myrle


On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi Greg, Jim, Roman, and Ross,
> >
> > We of the Apache Fineract community, have reached a consensus that we are
> > ready for graduation.  I've put together a proposal (
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/
> Graduation+Resolution)
> > to send to the incubator.  Would you please review it and make/suggest
> any
> > changes you believe still need to be made?
>
> It looks fine, my biggest concerns are:
>    * you are not articulating PMC growth during the incubation period
>    * looking at 11 PMC vs 12 commiters makes me wonder why single
>      out that one person
>
> Also, I'll update http://incubator.apache.org/projects/fineract.html
> shortly
>
> > Which one of you would like to submit it to incubator general?
>
> The process is for you to send it first as a [DISCUSS] thread within your
> own
> community. Give it 5 days or so to stew and unless somebody objects I can
> then open up an IPMC [DISCUSS] and then a [VOTE]
>
> > Thank you all four for getting us this far.
>
> Thanks for listening.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>

Reply via email to