Hey Roman, I'll start a thread labeled [DISCUSS]. Here's the most recent state of discussions among the community: http://markmail.org/thread/4vzjbopjeozrccka In that thread seven people gave their +1, and there were no objections.
Here's a log of what happened with respect to the community growth 12 committers at induction into incubation +1 committer: Jim Jagielski -1 committer: Michael Vorburger (couldn't find an apache id for him, when assembling the proposal. Please correct me if I'm wrong.) -1 committer: Andrew Dzakpasu (received no response in public or in private from him to the above referenced thread.) --------> 11 PMC members I'd like to keep Andrew on the committer list, and I'd like to add him to the PMC, but I don't feel comfortable doing the latter without his permission. The same goes for Michael, except that I don't even know how to keep him on the committer list without an apache id. This all brings me to a question: is the list of initial committers in the graduation proposal also the PMC? Or is it possible to start with a difference in the list of committers and PMC? Greets, Myrle On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Greg, Jim, Roman, and Ross, > > > > We of the Apache Fineract community, have reached a consensus that we are > > ready for graduation. I've put together a proposal ( > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/ > Graduation+Resolution) > > to send to the incubator. Would you please review it and make/suggest > any > > changes you believe still need to be made? > > It looks fine, my biggest concerns are: > * you are not articulating PMC growth during the incubation period > * looking at 11 PMC vs 12 commiters makes me wonder why single > out that one person > > Also, I'll update http://incubator.apache.org/projects/fineract.html > shortly > > > Which one of you would like to submit it to incubator general? > > The process is for you to send it first as a [DISCUSS] thread within your > own > community. Give it 5 days or so to stew and unless somebody objects I can > then open up an IPMC [DISCUSS] and then a [VOTE] > > > Thank you all four for getting us this far. > > Thanks for listening. > > Thanks, > Roman. >