On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Roman, > > I'll start a thread labeled [DISCUSS]. Here's the most recent state of > discussions among the community: http://markmail.org/thread/4vzjbopjeozrccka > In that thread seven people gave their +1, and there were no objections.
Right, but that's different from them actually reviewing a proposed resolution. > Here's a log of what happened with respect to the community growth > 12 committers at induction into incubation > +1 committer: Jim Jagielski > -1 committer: Michael Vorburger (couldn't find an apache id for him, when > assembling the proposal. Please correct me if I'm wrong.) > -1 committer: Andrew Dzakpasu (received no response in public or in private > from him to the above referenced thread.) > --------> 11 PMC members > > I'd like to keep Andrew on the committer list, and I'd like to add him to > the PMC, but I don't feel comfortable doing the latter without his > permission. The same goes for Michael, except that I don't even know how > to keep him on the committer list without an apache id. > > This all brings me to a question: is the list of initial committers in the > graduation proposal also the PMC? Or is it possible to start with a > difference in the list of committers and PMC? The resolution (and board by extension) doesn't really care that much about committers -- they care about PMC members. Now, given the size of your community -- I'd really suggest committers == PMC (unless you have a strong reason not to). Thanks, Roman.
