Hi Santosh!

Ok, thanks for your answer.
I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-418. When you
said "enhancement" did you mean i should create the ticket on JIRA as
"Improvement"?
or is it a bug?



El 8 mar. 2017 11:45 p. m., "Santosh Math" <sant...@confluxtechnologies.com>
escribió:

> Hi Lionel,
> Sorry for delayed reply. I reproduced your issue. You can rise Jira as
> enhancement.
>
> Thanks
> Santosh
>
> On Mar 7, 2017 1:55 AM, "Lionel Raymundi - Poincenot" <
> lio...@poincenot.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > We have noticed that penalty charges are being generated one day late for
> > some cases. For example:
> > .- Lets suppose the due date of an installment is on march the 5th.
> > .- Overdue penalty is configured as 1% of installment interest, charged
> > daily.
> > .- System configuration has Grace on Penalty posting = 0 and
> > penalty-wait-period = 0
> > .- Run the Apply penalties to Overdued Loans job.
> > .- Today is march the 7th, so I would expect to see penalties on that
> > installment on the repayment schedule considering the following:
> > a) Client didn't pay On march 5th. One penalty charge should be
> generated.
> > b) Client didn't pay On march 6th. Two penalty charges should be
> generated.
> >
> > .- I would also expect to see the charge generated with due as of date 05
> > and 06 March 2017 under "Charges" tab. But I only see one penalty, as of
> > 05.
> >
> > https://demo.openmf.org/#/viewloanaccount/748
> >
> > A shorter version of this would be: If I run the job on the N day, y
> would
> > expect to see charges until N-1 (the day before N). But I see only
> charges
> > generated until N-2 (Two days before).
> >
> > I know that maybe the tenant timezone and the computer where fineract is
> > running the demo version can be different, but I tested it on my local
> > environment with all timezones set correctly and noticed this behaviour.
> Is
> > this a bug or is it working as expected?
> >
> > Let me know if I was not clear enough...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Lionel
> >
>

Reply via email to