+1
Late as well...sorry!


On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 8:19 PM Joshua Poore <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> REMINDER: Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon 2.1.0 Release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Josh
>
> > On Feb 14, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Rob Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > A bit late, but +1:
> >
> > [x] Build and Unit Tests Pass
> > [x] DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE Files in Source and Binary Release
> > Packages
> > [x] Signatures and Hashes Match Keys
> > [x] CHANGELOG included with release distribution
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:14 PM Joshua Poore <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> pushed updated webpack.config.js that includes ALv2 header
> >>
> >>> On Feb 10, 2020, at 7:34 PM, Joshua Poore <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Disregard. You’re right. webpack config is .js. Missed that.
> >>>
> >>> You see any issues with our disclaimer given that the webpack config
> >> doesn’t have a header?
> >>>
> >>> Joshua Poore
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Feb 10, 2020, at 7:32 PM, Joshua Poore <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Dave,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for identifying! I thought comments aren’t supported in JSON.
> >> There are custom libs for doing that, but I doubt node and web pack can
> >> call them.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you can point me to an example, I’ll get it in there.
> >>>>
> >>>> Joshua Poore
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 10, 2020, at 5:03 PM, David Meikle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 23:12, Joshua Poore <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Folks,
> >>>>>>> Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon 2.1.0 Release Candidate 01
> >>>>>>> Source Release Artifacts:
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/apache-flagon-useralejs-incubating-2.1.0-RC-01/
> >>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/apache-flagon-useralejs-incubating-2.1.0-RC-01/
> >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows:
> >>>>>>> [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
> >>>>>>> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> >>>>>>> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
> >>>>> +1 (binding) : Performed the check list provided on the source
> release
> >>>>> package.
> >>>>> There are some files, like the webpack.config.js, flagged by Apache
> RAT
> >>>>> that we could put an AL header on. Not a deal breaker, but worth
> >>>>> considering.
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Dave
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to