I think theoricaly, that's could be possible, first the flex-config.xml
shouldn't contain any declarations to the librairies except playerglobal,
the lib folder should be emptied, you would have to create a project for
each lib in your IDE, the build configuration of each one should take care
of the dependecies,, may keeping an ant target for the locales... I should
give a try to that at time to see if I miss something.
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Harbs
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:03 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder
Okay. There's too much about the process that's kind of black magic to me. I
guess after I finish getting this working I'll understand how everything
ties together better. That's a good thing I guess… ;-)
I was under the impression that you could link to the source files instead
of the swcs. Why is the SDK libs different than regular libs?
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I did use the installer.
Which would of given you last release 4.9.
The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the
distribution for two reasons:
1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported.
2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9
release.
Make a release build from the source with ant release, copy and
unzip/untar the release and use the script in the IDE directory to make an
SDK usable for Flash Builder or any other IDE.
Does the source need to be compiled before it can work?
Um yes. The source gets compiled in swcs (in the frameworks/lib directory)
that your Flex application uses.
I wonder if now would be a good time to try InteliJ IDEA...
You would still have the package the SDK up, your issue is not unique to
just Flash Builder.
Hope that helps.
Justin
