Perhaps the lack of FXG support is indicative of Adobe's future support for
Flash tehcnology in general?
Oops, did I really say that?

On 15 March 2013 11:16, Sebastian Mohr <flex.masul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks John,
>
> In case these "key differences" between FXG and SVG still exist, I don't
> understand why Adobe folks consider not to support FXG 2.0 and forthcoming
> versions of FXG in their design tools - like Photoshop CS6 (and later),
> Illustrator CS6 (and later) and Fireworks CS6 (and later) ???
>
>
> --
> Sebastian (PPMC)
> Interaction Designer
>
> Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code:
> http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, John Cunliffe <mahn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > second hit<
> >
> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/09/30/why-adobe-chose-fxg-over-svg/
> > >on
> > google for "why fxg over svg":
> >
> > When initial work on an XML-based graphics interchange format began, the
> > natural first thought was to use SVG. However, there are key differences
> > between SVG and Flash Player’s graphics capabilities. These include core
> > differences in SVG and Flash’s rendering model with regards to filters,
> > transforms and text. Additionally, the interchange format needed to be
> able
> > to support future Flash Player features, which would not necessarily map
> to
> > SVG features. As such, the decision was made to go with a new interchange
> > format, FXG, instead of having a non-standard implementation of SVG. FXG
> > does borrow from SVG whenever possible.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Mohr <
> flex.masul...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > @Alex ... you wrote this:
> > >
> > > > Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about
> > FXG
> > > > that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not
> Flash?
> > >
> > > I don't know why Adobe created FXG? For now, I just know that I need it
> > for
> > > my work as interaction designer when working with Flash Catalyst CS5.5
> > ...
> > > Hopefully, Adobe folks on this list could explain that!
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sebastian (PPMC)
> > > Interaction Designer
> > >
> > > Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this
> code:
> > > http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/14/13 12:33 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm not sure what Adobe gains by continuing to
> > > > >> spend resources on FXG support at this time.  If you can show
> there
> > > > would
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> a significant upside, I will try to bring that case to the right
> > > people
> > > > in
> > > > >> Adobe.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure how I can convince Adobe, but here is my reasoning:
>  At
> > > my
> > > > > current and previous companies, Fireworks is used just because of
> its
> > > > > ability to convert visual designs into FXG.    We dabbled with
> > > Catalyst,
> > > > > but we found that the tool was too complicated to use for
> Designers,
> > > but
> > > > > too elementary for Developers.  But, the ability to serialize
> visual
> > > > assets
> > > > > as FXG turned out to be the best way to skin Flex apps.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the other side, I am very proficient with Photoshop and not too
> > > > familiar
> > > > > with Fireworks.  For my simple apps, I choose to create the skins
> in
> > > > > Photoshop and spit it out as FXG and just import it into Flex.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know other folks that used Illustrator for the same purpose.
>  (BTW,
> > > > > Illustrator CS6 still supports the "Save As... > FXG > FXG 2.0"
> > option.
> > > >  I
> > > > > just tried it out last night.  Not sure what to make of this. )
> > > > >
> > > > > Thats the possibility of three different tools Adobe could make
> money
> > > of
> > > > > off from customers who don't necessarily use these tools without
> FXG
> > > > > support.
> > > > >
> > > > > And frankly, the absence of this utility could potentially hurt my
> > > chance
> > > > > of making sure we dont move away from Flex where I work.
> > > > Don't PhotoShop and Illustrator output SVG as well?  What is it about
> > FXG
> > > > that is a must-have especially if you are targeting HTML and not
> Flash?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Alex Harui
> > > > Flex SDK Team
> > > > Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
regards,
Roland

-- 
Roland Zwaga
Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA

+32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.com

http://zwaga.blogspot.com
http://www.springactionscript.org
http://www.as3commons.org

Reply via email to