On 3/18/13 12:43 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, so what's the interest of migrating this repo except maybe for
> homogeneity, does it worth to migrate it ?
I think we should move everything to Git.
>
> -Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:39 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [LAZY] Asking Infra to make all git repos read-write.
>
> I put in the original FLAs from Adobe (they are binary files so didn't want
> to put them in the main project) and a tool for converting FLAs to FXG.
>
>
> On 3/18/13 12:09 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. Migrate the External project to git
>>
>> Why the External project is for ? I looked inside but never noticed it was
>> here before today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Fred
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> From: Om
>> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 7:27 PM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [LAZY] Asking Infra to make all git repos read-write.
>>
>> I will ask again:
>>
>> Any objections to making all git repos read/write? Alex is the only
>> person
>> who has said yes so far.
>>
>> Other than these anything else we need to go to Infra for?:
>>
>> 1. Migrate the External project to git
>> 2. Change commit email subject format.
>>
>> We can decided on the whiteboard git even after making it writable. Please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is David@Infra's response. This is the bug he is referring to:[1]
>>>
>>> David,
>>>> Folks outside the US are experiencing slowness in acccessing the git
>>>> repos. Is this something that can/will be resolved?
>>>> Also, what happens to the existing repos? Will they stay around as
>>>> read-only forever? We are wondering if we can go back and look at that
>>>> if
>>>> we find something missing in Git at a future date.
>>>> How is the External git repo looking?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>> Om,
>>>> I haven't spent anytime on External yet.
>>>> SVN will stay RO forever once you migrate - hence the importance of
>>>> diligence in the repo review. Once you begin forward movement,
>>>> remediating
>>>> any differences is practically impossible.
>>>> I suspect (but don't know) that the slowness is related to INFRA-5939
>>>> (ull provides the SSL front end to the git-wip-us, among others)
>>>> I don't see anything that suggests it would manifest as slowness in the
>>>> machine that git-wip-us actually lives on.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5939
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/17/13 9:22 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What does "fully tested" really mean? If a unix diff doesn't find
>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> missing, isn't that sufficient?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That and the history, I guess.
>>>>>>
>>>>> We've spot checked history in all of the repos, haven't we? We aren't
>>>>> going
>>>>> to spend the time to verify history on every file I hope.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I just looked at the first and last log entry in each history.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> BTW, what happens to our SVN repo? Does it go away or stay as R/O? If
>>>>> it
>>>>> stays as R/O, then let's definitely open the git repos. Any missing
>>>>> history
>>>>> is in SVN.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think it will stay on forever, but I have asked Infra just in case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
