+1 EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Yup, let's get it done. > > > On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities >> git repo. >> >> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections? >> >> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would >> need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I am >> pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> -------- >> David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549: >> ------------------------------------- >> >> Okay folks: >> >> I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same >> result. >> >> Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn handle >> branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify a >> layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree) >> >> The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which is >> the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of the >> migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout >> change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history. >> >> (BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks >> for that.) >> >> Let me know how you want to proceed with this. >> >> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617 >> -------- > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
