+1 too
-Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
+1
EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
Yup, let's get it done.
On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the
flex-utilities
git repo.
I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any
objections?
We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
need that because it was the early days of the Installer project and I
am
pretty sure that there is anything mission critical there.
Thanks,
Om
--------
David Nalley commented on INFRA-5549:
-------------------------------------
Okay folks:
I tried running through utilities 2 more times - came up with the same
result.
Here's the issue - because there are differences in how git and svn
handle
branches and tags, when we look to convert a SVN tree we have to specify
a
layout. (e.g. where tags, branches and trunk, live in the tree)
The problem is that on August 15 the tree layout was changed [1], which
is
the expected layout - so prior to that layout existing, in the eyes of
the
migration process nothing existed in that repo. In short - that layout
change essentially (from a git perspective.) restarted history.
(BTW - Paul Davis provided the sanity to catch this problem, many thanks
for that.)
Let me know how you want to proceed with this.
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1373617
--------
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
