+1 (binding) Peter Ent Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems
On 6/2/13 5:57 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >This vote comes from an original vote thread declared as null (see >original >thread for info about motivations): > >http://markmail.org/message/o6zjmorfh4lxuygo > >The new vote thread is considering the donation of the optional MVC/IOC >Swiz Framework. > >Points taken from the original vote thread: > >* Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK with >a microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well >designed. * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's >optional a NOT part of the main sdk. * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable >version, under Apache License 2.0, has its community and right now there's >no maintenance or upgrade since people behind the project is no longer >working with Flex technology. * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and >wiki >content. * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott (creator >of >Swiz) will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP >support, a feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex since >it >brings something very new to client web technologies and that will require >evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). > > >Here's the new points from Alex Harui to make clear what it implies: > >1) Swiz goes in its own repo. The original proposal says it could go into >a folder under utilities, but I think flexunit is a better model. >2) Swiz will have active development but release separately from the SDK. >The activity level isn't quite clear from the original proposal. People >need to be comfortable that this activity isn't an endorsement or >favoritism. >3) Acceptance of Swiz is not an endorsement or favoritism. >4) Any other app framework is welcomed to be donated via the same process. > >This vote thread will be open for the next 72 hours > >Please make your vote.
