After more than 72 hours, I'm closing the vote, refer to the next [Vote][Results] thread for the follow up
Thanks to all for your vote and contribution Carlos Rovira 2013/6/4 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > +1 binding > > On 6/4/13 9:02 AM, "Jeff Tapper" <j...@spoon.as> wrote: > > >+1 binding > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: carlos.rov...@gmail.com [mailto:carlos.rov...@gmail.com] On Behalf > >Of > >Carlos Rovira > >Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 5:58 AM > >To: dev@flex.apache.org > >Subject: [VOTE] Oprtional MVC/IOC Frameworks Donation: Swiz Framework > >Donation > > > >This vote comes from an original vote thread declared as null (see > >original > >thread for info about motivations): > > > >http://markmail.org/message/o6zjmorfh4lxuygo > > > >The new vote thread is considering the donation of the optional MVC/IOC > >Swiz > >Framework. > > > >Points taken from the original vote thread: > > > >* Swiz is a great addition to Apache Flex since it complements de SDK > >with a > >microarquitecture for application MVC, IOC, DI very simple and well > >designed. * This will be a project like flexunit or utilities. So it's > >optional a NOT part of the main sdk. * Swiz is already in 1.4.0 stable > >version, under Apache License 2.0, has its community and right now there's > >no maintenance or upgrade since people behind the project is no longer > >working with Flex technology. * Donation will be 1.4.0 source code and > >wiki > >content. * Future plans: if donation is successful, Chris Scott (creator > >of > >Swiz) will want to donate experimental 2.0.0 branch that brings AOP > >support, > >a feature that could bring a great benefit to Apache Flex since it brings > >something very new to client web technologies and that will require > >evolution at compiler level (introducing compile time weaving). > > > > > >Here's the new points from Alex Harui to make clear what it implies: > > > >1) Swiz goes in its own repo. The original proposal says it could go > >into a > >folder under utilities, but I think flexunit is a better model. > >2) Swiz will have active development but release separately from the SDK. > >The activity level isn't quite clear from the original proposal. People > >need to be comfortable that this activity isn't an endorsement or > >favoritism. > >3) Acceptance of Swiz is not an endorsement or favoritism. > >4) Any other app framework is welcomed to be donated via the same process. > > > >This vote thread will be open for the next 72 hours > > > >Please make your vote. > > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
