On Jun 3, 2013 12:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > The VM I run is a 2 core, 3,5GB memory 'medium' instance. A full run > takes 9 hours. I remember your VM was a bit lighter? > > EdB
I am hoping to follow your lead and create a medium instance as well. Now, if only there was a way to image your VM and make a clone of it. Do you know if something like this is possible with Azure? Thanks, Om > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2013 10:33 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >> > >> > So, the metric for success may require that script that checks for > >> > failures.txt and runs with the -failures options. > >> > >> Ok, that script is ready to go in 'jenkins.sh', it's commented out on > >> the bottom of the file. > >> > >> > But the interesting thing for me once we get this Jenkins thing running > >> > is: if several committers also set up this same Jenkins job, could we > > have > >> > them each run a subset of the mustella tests and report much sooner? I > >> > think it was you who suggested we could create a massively parallel > >> > mustella system. > >> > >> If only I was such a creative thinker. I won't take credit for that > >> idea as I don't have a clue where to start, even ;-) > >> > >> EdB > >> > >> > > > > I have an Azure VM sitting idle. Theoretically, we could add it as a > > second slave and divvy up the Mustella run into two halves. We should be > > able to have a single run in half the time. > > > > The more slaves we can add, the faster the run would get. > > > > Do you want me to give this idea a shot? > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
