Sorry, forgot to mention that the FlexJSOverlay is updated on [1]
and examples are at [2] with view source enabled for the Flash versions.

[1] http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/DataBindingTest/

On 6/26/13 3:50 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:

>Very cool :)
>
>for your mail I thought that examples had this update but I can't see
>modified examples in the commits? maybe I'm missing something?
>
>
>
>2013/6/26 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just checked in the beginnings of {} databinding in FlexJS.  If you
>>look
>> at the source code, the SimpleBinding and ConstantBinding beads that
>>were
>> in the earlier examples are replaced by {} expressions.  The compiler
>> generates a data structure describing the bindings, and a bead
>>interprets
>> the data structure and sets up the bindings as needed.  In this early
>> version, the binding bead is looking for a specific pattern that can
>> resolve to what should be faster ConstantBinding and SimpleBinding
>> expressions.  The rest of this week I'll be working on more and more
>> general and complex cases.
>>
>> The reason binding is applied by a bead is because it allows you to
>> optimize by replacing general databinding beads with beads that know
>> something about the binding context.  For example, in this prototype,
>>the
>> ViewBaseDataBinding bead knows that it is setting up bindings for a
>> ViewBase which means that it can make assumptions that, for instance,
>>the
>> applicationModel structure itself will not be changing (its properties
>> will, but not the reference to the model).  And that means you can use
>>one
>> less watcher and you can apply initial values at initComplete and not
>> necessarily at the instantiation of each widget.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Carlos Rovira
>Director de TecnologĂ­a
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>http://www.codeoscopic.com
>http://www.directwriter.es
>http://www.avant2.es

Reply via email to