Good catch.  Fixed.  Thanks,-Alex

On 6/28/13 3:24 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Sure thing.
>
>I still see that active development branch pointing to SVN which shows the
>last activity at a few months back.  Can you fix that to point to the new
>git repos?
>
>Om
>
>On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, made some updates to the wiki.  Thanks for reminding me to update
>>what
>> was there. I hadn't realized it was so stale.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/28/13 2:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Just did it.
>> >
>> >If you can update the links and the breaking news section of the page
>>here
>> >[1], that would be great.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >[1]
>> 
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Alex's+FlexJS+Prototype
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK with me.
>> >>
>> >> On 6/28/13 1:58 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Do you mind if I put out an official tweet about this?
>> >> >
>> >> >Om
>> >> >
>> >> >On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Sorry, forgot to mention that the FlexJSOverlay is updated on [1]
>> >> >> and examples are at [2] with view source enabled for the Flash
>> >>versions.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/
>> >> >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlexJS/DataBindingTest/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/26/13 3:50 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
>><carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Very cool :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >for your mail I thought that examples had this update but I can't
>> >>see
>> >> >> >modified examples in the commits? maybe I'm missing something?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >2013/6/26 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I just checked in the beginnings of {} databinding in FlexJS.
>>If
>> >>you
>> >> >> >>look
>> >> >> >> at the source code, the SimpleBinding and ConstantBinding beads
>> >>that
>> >> >> >>were
>> >> >> >> in the earlier examples are replaced by {} expressions.  The
>> >>compiler
>> >> >> >> generates a data structure describing the bindings, and a bead
>> >> >> >>interprets
>> >> >> >> the data structure and sets up the bindings as needed.  In this
>> >>early
>> >> >> >> version, the binding bead is looking for a specific pattern
>>that
>> >>can
>> >> >> >> resolve to what should be faster ConstantBinding and
>>SimpleBinding
>> >> >> >> expressions.  The rest of this week I'll be working on more and
>> >>more
>> >> >> >> general and complex cases.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The reason binding is applied by a bead is because it allows
>>you
>> >>to
>> >> >> >> optimize by replacing general databinding beads with beads that
>> >>know
>> >> >> >> something about the binding context.  For example, in this
>> >>prototype,
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> ViewBaseDataBinding bead knows that it is setting up bindings
>>for
>> >>a
>> >> >> >> ViewBase which means that it can make assumptions that, for
>> >>instance,
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> applicationModel structure itself will not be changing (its
>> >> >>properties
>> >> >> >> will, but not the reference to the model).  And that means you
>>can
>> >> >>use
>> >> >> >>one
>> >> >> >> less watcher and you can apply initial values at initComplete
>>and
>> >>not
>> >> >> >> necessarily at the instantiation of each widget.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >Carlos Rovira
>> >> >> >Director de TecnologĂ­a
>> >> >> >M: +34 607 22 60 05
>> >> >> >F:  +34 912 94 80 80
>> >> >> >http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> >> >> >http://www.directwriter.es
>> >> >> >http://www.avant2.es
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>

Reply via email to