Thanks. I hate that word.. "manually". Is there a more recent version or alternative to mockolate as well? And is this a multi day or multi hour process to mavenize the FDK? brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Unit testing is a pretty tricky thing in Flexmojos. That's one of the things > I am intending on performing the largest changes the the new plugin. But from > your question I can see you are using an about 100 year old Version of > Flexmojos and Flex. I know I did quite a lot of tweaks and updates in the > flexunit Support when we were working on releasing flexunit 4.x. So I would > like to ask you to update so a somewhat reasonably new Version of flexmojos > ... 6.0.1 would be best ... but Keep in mind that you Need to manually > mavenize the FDK you want to use. > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Avi Kessner [akess...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2013 09:52 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: FlexUnit > > I'm sorry to go off topic, but this is really starting to fustrate me. > If anyone is able to help me out over at stackOverflow I really > appreciate it! > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18505129/how-do-i-get-flexunit-flexmojos-and-mockolate-to-work-together > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > and the number 47 > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Cyrill Zadra <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Great! .. I pushed my changes always to "makeFlexUnitApacheReady". Shall I >> merge those changes also to develop branch and continue to work on this one? >> >> Cyrill >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Michael A. Labriola < >> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> In the FlexUnit repo right now there is only a master. >>> >>> I am creating a develop branch presently and pushing some changes we made >>> to the flexunit tasks to support a URL instead of just a local file when >>> executing tests. >>> >>> We should just make sure this gets integrated into master before the next >>> release. >>> >>> Mike >>>
