That actually sounds like a really good idea from my side ... and I really don't know, why nobody came up with that Suggestion yet ;-)
It would reduce the "Manual" part to the clicking of a Checkbox. In that case I would also opt for a second Checkbox that is available as soon as someone choose to mavenize in which a user can choose to automatically deploy to an repository Manager (Artifactory, Nexus) using the deployer tool from within the installer. Chris ________________________________________ Von: Nick Collins [ndcoll...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2013 16:16 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: FlexUnit Would a reasonable compromise be to add the "mavenizing" of the FDK as an option to the installer? Where all I need do is check a box saying "Use Apache Flex with Maven", and have the installer take care of converting the FDK to the maven format and adding it to my local Maven repository. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, and thank you. mavenizing was very quick and easy , deploying on > the other hand.. (atleast I don't have to do it manually) > > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > and the number 47 > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Avi Kessner <akess...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So legally we can't store these sdks for maven publicly? I see 4.1 is > > 112MB, yech. > > brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > > and the number 47 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >> And I hate "lawyers" more than "manually" ;-) > >> > >> It's actually a Multi Minute process to Mavenize an FDK as I created > the Apache Flex Mavenizer for that (It actually also mavenizes Adobe Flex > FDKs) together with the Auto deployer you should have any Flex FDK > mavenized and deployed in minutes. > >> > >> > https://flexmojos.atlassian.net/wiki/display/FLEXMOJOS/Migrating+to+6.x?src=search > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> Von: Avi Kessner [akess...@gmail.com] > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2013 12:33 > >> An: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Betreff: Re: FlexUnit > >> > >> Thanks. > >> I hate that word.. "manually". > >> Is there a more recent version or alternative to mockolate as well? > >> And is this a multi day or multi hour process to mavenize the FDK? > >> brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > >> and the number 47 > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Unit testing is a pretty tricky thing in Flexmojos. That's one of the > things I am intending on performing the largest changes the the new plugin. > But from your question I can see you are using an about 100 year old > Version of Flexmojos and Flex. I know I did quite a lot of tweaks and > updates in the flexunit Support when we were working on releasing flexunit > 4.x. So I would like to ask you to update so a somewhat reasonably new > Version of flexmojos ... 6.0.1 would be best ... but Keep in mind that you > Need to manually mavenize the FDK you want to use. > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> Von: Avi Kessner [akess...@gmail.com] > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2013 09:52 > >>> An: dev@flex.apache.org > >>> Betreff: Re: FlexUnit > >>> > >>> I'm sorry to go off topic, but this is really starting to fustrate me. > >>> If anyone is able to help me out over at stackOverflow I really > >>> appreciate it! > >>> > >>> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18505129/how-do-i-get-flexunit-flexmojos-and-mockolate-to-work-together > >>> brought to you by the letters A, V, and I > >>> and the number 47 > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Cyrill Zadra <cyrill.za...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> Great! .. I pushed my changes always to "makeFlexUnitApacheReady". > Shall I > >>>> merge those changes also to develop branch and continue to work on > this one? > >>>> > >>>> Cyrill > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Michael A. Labriola < > >>>> labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> In the FlexUnit repo right now there is only a master. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am creating a develop branch presently and pushing some changes we > made > >>>>> to the flexunit tasks to support a URL instead of just a local file > when > >>>>> executing tests. > >>>>> > >>>>> We should just make sure this gets integrated into master before the > next > >>>>> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> >
