> However, I noticed that asdoc "experimental" disclaimer does not show anymore > :-(
Fixed ( I forgot to rebuild the asdoc compiler jars). Status: - build is OK - asdoc build is OK (no error) - asdoc content looks good. Committing/pushing now. Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 11:07 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: ASDocs issue I have fixed the issue with AnimationTarget, and experimental manifest and now Experimental.swc and asdoc are compiling ok. Didn't commit yet. However, I noticed that asdoc "experimental" disclaimer does not show anymore :-( I am going to dig into the history of diffs, as suggested by Tom, to understand what went wrong. Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : Maurice Amsellem Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 11:04 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: ASDocs issue Thanks, I will do. -----Message d'origine----- De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com] Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 10:46 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ASDocs issue Check the web view of the branch e.g. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo?p=flex-sdk.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/develop and or the tree https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo?p=flex-sdk.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/develop;hb=refs/heads/develop and find the commitdiff that brought them back ? Tom On 11/10/2013 09:19, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Actually , there is a general problem here, that a number of files that were > removed have reappeared, of changes that was made have been cancelled, after > I made a pull/merge. > > I am not familiar enough with git to understand how this can happen. > > Anyway I feel like it's not safe to just try to recover that lost changes by > hand. > > Any idea ? > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 10:13 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet > : RE: ASDocs issue > > Actually, the problem comes from asdoc build.xml It's referencing > (line 150 and 168 the namespace " > library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark-mobilecomponents" which does not > exist) As far as I know, mobile components are also in the regular > spar namespace (library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark) > > Since mobile components and spark components are referenced in a different > manifest file in the asdoc build (166 and 168). > it's legal that they use the same namespace. > It shouldn't cause any collision or overlap. > > So I made the change above, and now I have the " AnimationTarget" compilation > error :-(. > > Regarding this error, it's because AnimationTarget (which has been removed > from experimental, as it was redundant with spark) has mysteriously > reappeared . > > Trying to fix > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 09:48 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet > : RE: ASDocs issue > > I have checked the asdoc build.xml and it's missing some of the changes I > have made before (and I am sure I have commited and pushed, on 10/6). > I have also noticed some of the classes I have removed in experimental > (CalloutDropDownController, CallOutSkin) have reappeared when I merged from > origin. > > I don't know what went wrong. > I can make sure the asdoc build works again on my side and recommit/push the > changes to origin. > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] > Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre 2013 09:39 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet > : RE: ASDocs issue > > I have run the asdoc build.xml and getting this error: > > D:\ApacheFlex\git_source\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\mobiletheme\src\spark\skins\mobile\ViewMenuSkin.mxml: > Could not resolve <s:ViewMenuLayout> to a component implementation. > > <s:ViewMenuLayout horizontalGap="2" verticalGap="2" > id="contentGroupLayout" > > It seems to be related to the manifest issue you are talking about. > > I will check later today when I have some time. > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : vendredi 11 octobre > 2013 08:58 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ASDocs issue > > > > On 10/10/13 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> None of the commit emails I see from you seem to mention develop >>> branch. >> Look like my local develop branch was tracking release for some odd >> reason I'll fix and merge for you. > OK, was able to reproduce the problem. I've never worked with ASDoc, but in > looking at the ant script, it appears there are no Flex SWCs in the process > and everything is based on source paths. Also, it appears that there is a > separate namespace for mobilecomponents and that may be why this code doesn't > compile, since the "s" in the mxml is mapped to the spark namespace which is > mapped to a manifest that doesn't have mobile components. But if that were > true, I'd think there'd be lots of other failures like this. Let me know if > you get past this before you quit for the day otherwise I'll try to dig > deeper. > >>> Should I just push everything to develop then merge all of it to >>> release? >> That seems the simplest way to me. > OK, pushed and merged (I think). >>> Anything I have to watch out for? >> Given that these were done a long time ago that there no merge issues. > I'm about to shut down for the night. I'll see what the mustella runs report > in the morning. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > >
