Chris, Arff, I've been to quick, don't consider my 4th arguments, I was thinking to something else :-)
-Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:54 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer 1- I'm short of time at the moment and that's a long run even without thinking to integrate with the actual code 2- Anyway, before I integrate anything in the actual code of the installer, its code needs to be refactored 3- There's no jar produced at the moment for the converter, that something to be considered too. 4- It's not allowed in every company the user can manage the repo he wants to access, in big ones, he has to go by the company one which in return, proxied the repo they choose. -Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de] Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:43 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : AW: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer Still I can't really see what would be the Problem to add the mavenizer to the Installer? I guess this would resolve any legal Problems. I do see some Major Speed improvement Option to Switch the Deployer to use Mavens wagon instead of making hundreds of mvn-calls, but adding the mavenizer to the installer still seems to be the best Option from my Point of view. Chris ________________________________________ Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 28. Oktober 2013 10:17 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer Hi Justin, >What to stop users sharing that URL and/or user credentials around? I thought about it too and ended to think I don't want to add more restrictions than what exists today, I mean today, once you accepted a license and downloaded an Adobe Artifact, you can share it as you like, that's not even nominative. I just want to replicate the actual security, so, yes, if an user wants to share the credentials, it can do it, as it can do it with the artifact itself. > As long as you make it clear that these are not official releases and > for development use only as per Apache policy. Np, it will be suffixed with "-SNAPSHOT " with means in Maven, non-released > Could it cope with it load and the costs that is likely to incur > (assume 100 or 200 installs a day)? Who owns and maintains the server? Could the apache Flex PMC be given access to it? >From what I understand, I'm not charged or should be very low rate, I will verify anyway, can't do it now, windowsazure has a 401. I own and maintain the server, it is the same kind than the Erik ones, it will serve me for some of my devs too (probably) or / and to test the SDK RCs and I can give access to PMCs who ask me. Thanks, -Fred -----Message d'origine----- De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : lundi 28 octobre 2013 10:03 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer Hi, > From the Installer, users already have to accept licenses for the > third party artifacts, for those users I can grant access to a online > maven repo which serves the Mavenized SDKs What to stop users sharing that URL and/or user credentials around? > I can even add the lasts nightly mavenized build versions. As long as you make it clear that these are not official releases and for development use only as per Apache policy. > The server exist today as it serves me, it serves up to the 4.11 > version Could it cope with it load and the costs that is likely to incur (assume 100 or 200 installs a day)? Who owns and maintains the server? Could the apache Flex PMC be given access to it? Thanks, Justin
