I found time for a quick read. Thanks for taking the time to put together this document.
Is there a reason why you are proposing Lazy forms of voting for most actions? I kind of like seeing how many folks vote +1 and who they are. Doesn't Lazy essentially only solicit vetos? Did you/Can you check whether it should be "[VOTE][RESULT]" or "[RESULT][VOTE]" I think someone is creating a vote monitoring tool that scans subject lines. Thanks, -Alex On 11/6/13 4:59 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >I haven't had a chance to read it. I will in about 4 hours. > >I'd say the Voting.html only requires majority vote, but I'd rather >iterate on the proposal to see if we can get consensus. > >On 11/6/13 4:11 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Anyone else? Do people think they are in a good enough start to start a >>VOTE? And would Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members be the voting system to >>use? >> >>Thanks, >>Justin >
