Hi, > Is there a reason why you are proposing Lazy forms of voting for most > actions? Because that's generally the Apache default for voting in committers, PMC members etc etc. Although it does vary somewhat with projects with guidelines/bylaws. Being able to veto the voting in of a committer or PMC member seems reasonably important (to me anyway). Otherwise it could be little more than a popularity or voting bloc contest - not that that has happened yet. As always a valid veto needs a good reason.
> I kind of like seeing how many folks vote +1 and who they are. > Doesn't Lazy essentially only solicit vetos? Hasn't stopped people voting +1 or +0 on previous consensus votes we've taken. > Can you check whether it should be "[VOTE][RESULT]" or > "[RESULT][VOTE]" Will do. Thanks, Justin
