Done.  (bot update pending)

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 17:49
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects

Yes, that would probably be the safe thing to do.

Thanks and sorry for the hassle,
-Alex

On 12/18/13 8:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
wrote:

>I undestand.
>
>FYI, the app is already included in the showcase, as I read your email 
>after.
>Shall I withdraw it temporarily while waiting for the legal stuff to be 
>fixed.?
>
>Maurice
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 
>2013 17:33 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Flex Showcase legal 
>aspects
>
>IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and 
>wait to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple.
>
>If you are a famous celebrity and happen to buy a particular brand of 
>clothing and someone sees you wearing it in public, folks can probably 
>tweet and Facebook that they saw you wearing it, but the company that 
>makes the clothing probably can't put that on their site without your 
>permission.
>
>I will start a thread on legal-discuss.
>
>If you want to read more, here is a links.  Imagine that the TV company 
>is Apache and we are the ones wanting to use the TV company's name on 
>our site.
>
>-Alex
>
>[1] http://apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/
>
>
>On 12/18/13 7:29 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with 
>>>the screen shots and just remove any based on valid take down 
>>>requests from the owners.
>>
>>Also what I think. thanks
>>
>>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler....@usmc.mil]
>>Envoyé : mercredi 18 décembre 2013 16:11 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet
>>: RE: Flex Showcase legal aspects
>>
>>Maybe we should add them in good faith of being in compliance with the 
>>screen shots and just remove any based on valid take down requests 
>>from the owners.
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to