I think enough information has been received that it would be hard to claim we weren't aware.
-Alex On 12/19/13 2:38 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: >It's not intentionally violated copyright and trademark. The person has >submitted it to us with the understanding we are clear to use it. That's >the good faith part... we are trusting them in what they are telling us >is correct. There is no way to confirm everything we receive. > >-Mark > >-----Original Message----- >From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:33 AM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: Re: Flex Showcase legal aspects > >IMO, it is not a good idea to violate copyright and trademark law and wait >to see if you get caught, even if the remedy is simple. > >If you are a famous celebrity and happen to buy a particular brand of >clothing and someone sees you wearing it in public, folks can probably >tweet and Facebook that they saw you wearing it, but the company that >makes the clothing probably can't put that on their site without your >permission. > >I will start a thread on legal-discuss. > >If you want to read more, here is a links. Imagine that the TV company is >Apache and we are the ones wanting to use the TV company's name on our >site. > >-Alex
