On 3/15/14 6:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >I can compile from source, it has LICENCE, README etc, tests pass and I >can create a binary distribution, the rat report on the initial source >tree is clean. > >What should the version number be? Was 4.1.0 ever officially released? > >Look like we just need to create a source distribution as well as a >binary one and that's about it? Anyone know of any other issues? I happened to notice that SWFObject was in the repo, and potentially had an Apache header added to it. It might be worth grepping for 'Copyright' and 'license' and see what shows up. > >A couple of minor issues - but noting I can see to stop making a release. >- After compiling rat_report shows 5 incompatible licences. Why wouldn't that be a show stopper? -Alex
