Special thanks to Alex for the idea of the fix. >Who wants to give Darren the good news? ;-) I can do. BTW, I don't think he will jump on moving to 4.13, because he already realized that it doesn't solve their performance issue. However, if something needs to be fixed in the charts library, it will be easier for them to get the fix if they are using the latest release.
Anyway, I agree it's a huge improvement, because all apps that use ILOG can now be migrated to Apache Flex... Maurice Maurice -----Message d'origine----- De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : jeudi 20 mars 2014 01:43 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr compatibility Good news! The fix works and ILOG Elixir components are usable with Flex 4.13 without any errors now. This is a huge deal! Works with 4.6. Broken with 4.11 and 4.12. Now working fine with 4.13. Thanks Maurice and Alex for figuring this one out. Who wants to give Darren the good news? ;-) Thanks, Om On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Maurice Amsellem < maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote: > >But if this change does break someone, I am hopeful you will help > >them by > pushing another one out the door ;-) > > Of course. > > >Yes, I know. You are under no obligation to be an RM for any release. > I think my manager (who is regularly reading the dev ML) is getting a > little bit stressed (to say the least) about my ability to deliver on > my daily job (the one I am paid for ;-) ). > > So regarding the 4.12.1, I will put a limit on the amount of time I > can spend on it, and then give it back to Justin if it takes too long. > Sorry about that, but I can't promise what I can't do. > > Maurice > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars > 2014 16:41 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: ILOG Elixr > compatibility > > > > On 3/19/14 8:35 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> > wrote: > > >Wait a minute, I only said I was willing to try for 4.12.1, and with > >help from Justin. > > > >Depending on how difficult the experience will be , I may or not > >agree to do it on further (minor) releases. > Yes, I know. You are under no obligation to be an RM for any release. > But if this change does break someone, I am hopeful you will help them > by pushing another one out the door ;-) > > -Alex > >
