On 3/30/14 11:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> You can check fluint yourself and compare. >Which tells me nothing. The code was donated to Apache by DP, the person >who checked those 2 files I believe had signed an agreement with DP >handing over the IP so what exactly is the issue here? Adobe (if they >could be bothered) would happy donate FlexUnit to us, but given it under >BSD that's not really an issue either. My understanding is that Adobe donated stuff to fluint under Adobe copyright and BSD. That's why you put the Adobe header back in a bunch of files. My view says that two of these Adobe files are in CIListener. I think we need Mike to verify or provide a more detailed explanation of how those two files can appear to be the same but the CIListener version is not under Adobe copyright. > >> Well, IMO, we're blocked until we get resolution on how to make up for >>not >> having done the IP Clearance process correctly. >Despite having had other realises? So does that mean we can't release a >SDK or anything else either until that is resolved? IMO, yes. >Given you had no reply to the that IP question how long do we put >everything on hold? Until we get the ok from Incubator/Legal. -Alex
