HI, > NOTICE and LICENSE look ok, but I still think we need to mention somewhere > that there is BSD code in this source distribution. > We could (should?) also mention this fact in LICENSE (but not copy the entire > BSD license).
There is no need to do so for MIT or BSD licences to be mentioned anywhere else when the MIT or BSD headers are kept in the relevant files(s) as per the discussion on incubator the other week: "For source redistributions, the MIT, 2-clause BSD, and 3-clause BSD licenses are all satisfied by retaining the license text and copyright notice embedded in each dependency source file." We have done that. If the headers has been replaced by an Apache ones then we would need to mention them. Which option do you want? 1. Keep as it it currently 2. Added BSD and MIT back to LICENSE and remove the non Apache headers Thanks, Justin
