> well honestly, I think Adobe believes Flash is nearly dead on web, except > maybe video, and games for now.
As long as Adobe still focusing on video and gaming (high end features where HTML5 hardly follow) on Flash platform, the need of Flash player in web browser will always be there, as long as there is Flash player in browser, I can build my rich Flex app on desktop web browser peacefully and enjoy the productivity, browser compatibility and performance that Apache Flex gives, who care it’s done by HTML or Flash, anyway I am creating a solution to solve business problems, Apache Flex is more than capable in doing this compare to HTML, who care it is done by HTML/JS or Flash. Thanks for Adobe is smart enough to reposition Flash platform by focusing on video and gaming high end features in order to protect and remain Flash player on desktop web browser. On Jun 11, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Martin Miko <marrtinm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi DarkStone, > > well honestly, I think Adobe believes Flash is nearly dead on web, except > maybe video, and games for now. So I'd expect that this version of Flash > Pro will foreshadow a transition to a more "standardized and open" H5, JS > et al. environment. And of course, Adobe will dump all flash stuff or at > least make it niche in the process; no more ways to milk the devs/consumers > -> does not make business sense to them. These are my pessimistic two cents. > > -- > Martin > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:05 AM, DarkStone <darkst...@163.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just got confirmation the new Flash Pro will focus on WebGL and H5/JS, I >> have seen a leaked screenshot showing WebGL project can be created in Flash >> Pro. >> >> I'm confused, does Adobe find a way to convert Stage3D code to WebGL? Do >> they create a AS to JS compiler of their own? >> >> >> >> DarkStone >> 2014-06-11 >> >> >> At 2014-06-11 03:24:39, "DarkStone" <darkst...@163.com> wrote: >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> Your concept about "layer group" is very cool and practical. >>> >>> Well, let's see what will really happen on 6.18. >>> >>> DarkStone >>> 2014-06-11 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> At 2014-06-11 06:36:26, "Nick Collins" <ndcoll...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Well, presumably the Flash Pro tooling would be updated to provide access >>>> to those features. For example, in the main timeline perhaps they include >>>> "layer groups" for each of the stage layers, that I could re-order as I >>>> choose to. On those timelines, any Stage3D content would exist on that >>>> layer group, display list content would exists in its layer group, and >> the >>>> same for the StageWebView and StageVideo content. >>>> >>>> Another cool platform feature would be native support for WebRTC to >> enable >>>> interoperability between Flash clients and native web clients for >> realtime >>>> audio/video. I know Flash has RTMFP and RTMP, but honestly, the quality >> in >>>> WebRTC, if you're using a compatible browser or plugin, is much higher >> than >>>> what Flash provides. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, DarkStone <darkst...@163.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Nick, >>>>> >>>>> Well, none of what you said related to the Flash Pro itself. >>>>> >>>>> These two wishes I think they only have something to do with the FP/AIR >>>>> runtimes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What you expect from the Flash Pro tool? >>>>> >>>>> DarkStone >>>>> 2014-06-11 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At 2014-06-11 02:42:14, "Nick Collins" <ndcoll...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Another one I would like to see... the ability to programmatically >> control >>>>>> the layer depth of the various stages. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Nick Collins <ndcoll...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> How about this one for the wish list... updating Stage3D to be on >> par, >>>>> or >>>>>>> even surpass, Unity in realtime 3D processing and lighting >> capabilities, >>>>>>> with native FBX support built into the runtime. That would allow >> you to >>>>>>> create content in virtually any of the major 3D applications and >> bring >>>>> it >>>>>>> into your Flash app natively. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>
