Hi, > The Google copyright is in the TTF file. Is that sufficient for you to > accept that these are Google fonts? No it is not acceptable. Looking inside a binary file to find out the copyright is not exactly obvious or convenient.
> Add that to what file according to what quote from the LICENSE and NOTICE > document? The LICENSE file obviously, there are probably other options, but that seems to me the most obvious and straightforward way to fix this issue. > I think this isn't a Derivative Work. Incorrect. Section 4 clearly states it refers to both types of works: "4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions:" > Are you referring to their desire to not have a long list of copyrights in > the headers of every file and/or to only claim copyright on the collective > work? Of course not. All I asking for is proper legal acknowledgement of Google copyright. This is very easily fixed by adding a few line to the LICENSE. Until is resolved my -1 stands, that -1 is of course is not a veto. Justin
