Justin, did you see my earlier email? Thanks, Om On Jun 17, 2014 2:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > The Google copyright is in the TTF file. Is that sufficient for you to > > accept that these are Google fonts? > No it is not acceptable. Looking inside a binary file to find out the > copyright is not exactly obvious or convenient. > > > Add that to what file according to what quote from the LICENSE and NOTICE > > document? > The LICENSE file obviously, there are probably other options, but that > seems to me the most obvious and straightforward way to fix this issue. > > > I think this isn't a Derivative Work. > Incorrect. Section 4 clearly states it refers to both types of works: > "4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or > Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and > in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions:" > > > Are you referring to their desire to not have a long list of copyrights > in > > the headers of every file and/or to only claim copyright on the > collective > > work? > Of course not. All I asking for is proper legal acknowledgement of Google > copyright. > > This is very easily fixed by adding a few line to the LICENSE. > > Until is resolved my -1 stands, that -1 is of course is not a veto. > > Justin
