This is why Erik suggests a legal-discuss@flex.a.o ML: so you and I can argue this without polluting the dev list with noise. ________________________________________ From: Justin Mclean [jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:08 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3
Hi, >> Check out this link. I think it disagrees. >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201405.mbox/%3cCAAS6=7iGt0xW4oBe0sSXC7RzGgDP=kubhgkojzuezbbirq2...@mail.gmail.com%3e >A little further down it also says that release candidates are "packages are >intended for developers (and users who follow the development discussions)". IMO, this means users following the dev-list. >Personally I think we need all the help we can get. :-) Me too, but I don't think that includes advertising on users@. However I will ask on whatever Apache-wide list that release-policy discussion is on. -Alex
