Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So >from >where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline. > >EdB > > > > >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues >> currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one >>seems >> real: >> >> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken: >> >> >> >>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend >>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS >> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed >> CompareBitmap(body:step 2) compare returned[object BitmapData] >> >> Here are the related pngs: >> >> Baseline: >> >> >>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda >>ntselector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png >> >> Broken: >> >> >>http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda >>ntselector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png.bad.png >> >> Nothing serious here. If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this >> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
