On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0?  Just changing the baseline
>> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier.  I'll take a look at it shortly.
>>
>
> Oh well, it looks like Mustella has passed with no failures now.  This was
> with FP 14.0 btw.
>  Lets see if it fails again.
>
> I have put in a fix for the flex-sdk_air job as well.  We will know by the
> end of the day.
>
>
The git issue has been fixed.  Lets if all tests pass.


> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>> >Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>> >from
>> >where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
>> >
>> >EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape.  There are two issues
>> >> currently.  One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one
>> >>seems
>> >> real:
>> >>
>> >> In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> >>Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descend
>> >>antSelectors_RuntimeCSS
>> >> descendantSelector_basic_noMatch_style_runtimecss Failed
>> >> CompareBitmap(body:step 2)  compare returned[object BitmapData]
>> >>
>> >> Here are the related pngs:
>> >>
>> >> Baseline:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>
>> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>> >>ntselector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png
>> >>
>> >> Broken:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://flex-mustella.cloudapp.net/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/mustella/tests
>>
>> >>/Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/baselines/descenda
>> >>ntselector_basic_nomatch_style_runtime...@win.png.bad.png
>> >>
>> >> Nothing serious here.  If no one has a suggestion on how to 'fix' this
>> >> issue, I will be creating a new baseline and checking it in.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Ix Multimedia Software
>> >
>> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >3521 VB Utrecht
>> >
>> >T. 06-51952295
>> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to