Thats a valid argument during a release, not out of IMO. Btw, wasnt able to get time to test this rc but Im now on Holliday and will try to get some time from greece next week to have a look at it, hopefully Ill be able to
--- Message initial --- De : "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> Envoyé : 19 décembre 2014 17:36 A : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful We could go with commits@, but I thought dev@ was better because the potential voters need to know what changed since they last formulated their opinion on the release and all of that discussion is going on dev@. -Alex On 12/19/14, 4:43 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: >Why are these in the dev emails instead commits? > >-Mark > >-----Original Message----- >From: flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 7:26 AM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful > >flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #41 - Successful > >Changes since last build: >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs > >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs > >[akamud] Changed FlatSpark property to maintain proportions' name to >'fixedAspectRatio' > > >For more information, check the console output at >http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/41 >/.
