+1 to send these emails to dev. There should not be too many of these and the intended audience are not going to be subscribed to commits@
Thanks On Dec 19, 2014 9:56 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thats a valid argument during a release, not out of IMO. > > Btw, wasnt able to get time to test this rc but Im now on Holliday and > will try to get some time from greece next week to have a look at it, > hopefully Ill be able to > > --- Message initial --- > > De : "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> > Envoyé : 19 décembre 2014 17:36 > A : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : Re: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful > > We could go with commits@, but I thought dev@ was better because the > potential voters need to know what changed since they last formulated > their opinion on the release and all of that discussion is going on dev@. > > -Alex > > On 12/19/14, 4:43 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> > wrote: > > >Why are these in the dev emails instead commits? > > > >-Mark > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.ci.bui...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 7:26 AM > >To: dev@flex.apache.org > >Subject: [4.14] # Apache Flex SDK 4.14 nightly build 41: Successful > > > >flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #41 - Successful > > > >Changes since last build: > >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs > > > >[erik] Updated with recently resolved JIRAs > > > >[akamud] Changed FlatSpark property to maintain proportions' name to > >'fixedAspectRatio' > > > > > >For more information, check the console output at > > > http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/41 > >/. > >
